User:PlagueBearer/sandbox
This is what I get when I use the re-use Citation feature. You can delete this when after you look at it.
1 test-creating a citation[1]
2 test me-creating a second citation[2]
3 test me baby one more time-use the "re-use citation" from the first citation[1]
Further examples
For instance:
References
What happens is that footnote ":0" is for #1 but also #4, and ":0" doesn't refer to the year or page or anything, so it's terribly difficult to look up without using a search function for ":0" or by manually/visually searching the code. Also, ":0" refers to topic 1, on page 17. It can be very confusing.
And when reusing a citation, it gets more complicated. footnote [2] is also ":0", and is used in topic #4 and refers to p.3. And it's further complicated by trying to look up which footnote it is in the Citations list, and finding that one wants to use [3]... but [3] in the code is labelled "name=:2" (and is for p.1).
A more straightforward method which allows another editor to simply refer to a repeated citation by knowing which sources have been cited, and knowing the source they're citing from would be by using names with more clarity, like this:
It makes it easier to find previous sources in the code, and easier for a later editor to say, "I am quoting Some Source Name, p.17, so I know I can use "name=source17", since I already saw that and won't have to look it up again." They don't have to memorize every footnote and how it relates to the [4] alone.
Next Attempt at citations with the RefRenamer
- Quick brown fox [1]
- Mr. Jock, TV quiz PhD.[2]
- Waltz, nymph[3]
- The jay, pig, fox, zebra and my wolves quack![1]
One more time,