User talk:Smillan 31: Difference between revisions
Smillan 31 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
bibs |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I thought I'd make it my job to put out some of the more obscure little tidbits I've been running across lately while reading tAB. Thanks for taking the lead on this! --[[User:Smillan 31|Smillan 31]] | I thought I'd make it my job to put out some of the more obscure little tidbits I've been running across lately while reading tAB. Thanks for taking the lead on this! --[[User:Smillan 31|Smillan 31]] | ||
==Bibliographies== | |||
Generally speaking, I think the more references the better. However, IMO, "going overboard," would be to list EVERY source where, for instance, the word "Greyhawk" appears in the [[Greyhawk]] article, even if it isn't a GH product. Another example would be to list every appearance of a priest or temple of Pelor in the [[Pelor]] article. In general, however, i think we should err on the side of too many references, rather than too few. I'd personally rather rule on articles with "too many" references on a case-by-case basis, rather than making a hard & fast rule of "''x'' number of refs per article."--[[User:149.160.118.3|149.160.118.3]] 18:15, 6 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:15, 6 June 2008
Welcome!
Congratulations! You're the first to add actual GH content to our wiki! Let me know if you have any questions.--Robbastard 19:44, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
I thought I'd make it my job to put out some of the more obscure little tidbits I've been running across lately while reading tAB. Thanks for taking the lead on this! --Smillan 31
Bibliographies
Generally speaking, I think the more references the better. However, IMO, "going overboard," would be to list EVERY source where, for instance, the word "Greyhawk" appears in the Greyhawk article, even if it isn't a GH product. Another example would be to list every appearance of a priest or temple of Pelor in the Pelor article. In general, however, i think we should err on the side of too many references, rather than too few. I'd personally rather rule on articles with "too many" references on a case-by-case basis, rather than making a hard & fast rule of "x number of refs per article."--149.160.118.3 18:15, 6 June 2008 (EDT)