Category talk:Candidates for deletion
Page Use and Discussion Format
This is where to discuss page deletions!
For each separate page, use a separate ==Header==. Place the newest page discussions at the top of the list below.
Include a link to the page being discussed.
Place a vote for its resolution with one of the following:
- Keep: (leave the page as is) followed by your reasoning
- Delete: (remove the page entirely without keeping the information) followed by your reasoning
- Merge: (merge information with another page) followed by your reasoning
- Move: (remove the page, but rename it with a better title) followed by your reasoning
Once a consensus has been reached, an Admin or Bureaucrat will take appropriate action.
Example: Place New Discussions Here
Place a [[Wikilink to the Page]] here.
- Add your vote and/or reason for deletion here.
Red One
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This has to have citation for that image ... specifically it also needed to have a "Licensing" provided by the uploader. But, at the very least, it needs to have attribution added, since it is of unknown origin. The image is definitely not from the sourcebook. [Image was found to be Midjourney generative AI. Deleted for policy violation.Jawal Severnain (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2024 (CST)]
A single entry in Stromwrack (2005).
No direct apparent link to Greyhawk. It needs even an indirect one.
- Delete — or Keep, but only if credit/citation can be found or provided.
The result was delete Though there's not been consensus, the article does not establish any kind of notability or that the source has significant use/coverage. Since there isn't any opposing vote, the page has been deleted.Jawal Severnain (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2024 (CST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Individual pages for druidic orders or groves
Though the AfD below ("Druidic Orders of the Flanaess") was for the page which included all the orders, apparently, there are also individual pages for at least some orders.
- Delete or Move: The individual pages for the druidic orders from Paul Stromberg's article in OJ15 should be removed for the same reason as the main page for the druidic orders (below).—Jawal Severnain (talk) 12:37, 5 December 2022 (CDT)
Druidic Orders of the Flanaess
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete Though there's not been consensus, the article does not establish any kind of notability or that the source has significant use/coverage. Since there isn't any opposing vote, the page has been deleted.—Jawal Severnain (talk) 12:37, 4 October 2022 (CDT)
Druidic Orders of the Flanaess
- Delete or Move: Aside from the fact that the source is fan-created (OJ15), the title of the page isn't proper, anyway. " ... of the Flanaess" isn't necessary—. Pages outside the Flanaess might be different. --Icarus (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2020 (CST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.